Two Faculty Positions for Innovators in Digital Humanities, Cultural Informatics, & Multimedia Writing

Michigan State University, College of Arts and Letters
Technology, Culture, and Creativity Cluster

For our growing dynamic initiatives at the intersections of technology, culture and creativity, the College of Arts and Letters invites applications for a multidisciplinary team that embraces a design thinking approach dedicated to a common sense of values: creativity, teamwork, end-user focus, and curiosity. Successful candidates should be committed to engaging students in real-world problems within the larger cultural shift from a consumer culture to a creative society increasingly defined by mediated experiences. The ideal candidates will excel in their disciplinary fields. They will also analyze and theorize the larger questions posed by the ever-changing media landscape and its potential for creative community participation and positive social change. We are committed to embedding the creative disciplinary questions of how we author, design, and perform cutting-edge new media experiences within a larger social and cultural context. Those hired will support the College of Arts and Letters in its focus on shaping students who go out into the world and have an impact.

In addition to collaborating in the development of College of Arts and Letters initiatives and in grant activity to support those initiatives, the new faculty will join the relevant vibrant departments (Art and Art History; Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures; Theatre) as described below.

WRAC POSITION DESCRIPTION-Digital Humanities

The Department of Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures at Michigan State University seeks a colleague in Digital Humanities, Community Informatics, or Digital Media and Culture. We are interested in scholars who bridge the gap between critical and creative studies, and whose teaching and research is in one or more of the following areas: human-computer interaction; information architecture, cultural informatics, user-experience design; or new media arts and storytelling. This is an academic year, tenure system faculty (rank open) or academic specialist appointment to begin fall 2011. Salary competitive and commensurate with background and experience. The position is part of a cluster hire for the new technology, culture and creativity initiatives of the College of Arts and Letters. (For more about the College of Arts and Letters multi-disciplinary initiatives go to: www.cal.msu.edu.) The ideal candidate will bring enthusiastic willingness to work collaboratively with colleagues in the department and college. Within Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures (WRAC), the new colleague will contribute to the department’s vertical writing curriculum that includes first-year writing, an undergraduate major in professional writing, and a graduate program in rhetoric and writing. Depending on precise area of expertise, major teaching responsibilities will include such courses as web authoring and information/interaction design as well as courses that will contribute to new college initiatives in digital humanities; other expectations include an active research agenda, grant activity, and contribution to outreach and engagement.

In its vertical writing curriculum, WRAC’s mission is to offer culturally and technologically relevant writing instruction, focused on processes of inquiry. WRAC is home to cutting-edge research on digital writing practices, professional and technical writing, community literacies, and cultural rhetorics. Further information about the department is available at http://wrac.msu.edu/.

Qualifications: Applicants expected to hold a PhD or other terminal degree in rhetoric, writing, or a related field or (in the case of specialists) have equivalent professional experience.

All applications for this position must be submitted electronically at the Michigan State University Human Resources website (http://jobs.msu.edu/). Applications should include a statement of interest describing qualifications and experience and a c.v.   Review of applications will begin February 21, 2011, and continue until position is filled. For inquiries contact Bill Hart-Davidson at hartdav2 [at] msu [dot] edu.

WRAC Position Description: Multimedia Writing
The Department of Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures at Michigan State University seeks a colleague whose teaching and research focus principally on multimedia writing and video composing, with desirable subsidiary interests in global and cross-cultural contexts for multimedia writing and video composing and/or visual rhetoric. This is an academic year, tenure system faculty (rank open) or academic specialist appointment. Salary competitive and commensurate with background and experience. The position is part of a cluster hire for the new technology, culture and creativity initiatives of the College of Arts and Letters. (For more about the College of Arts and Letters multi-disciplinary initiatives go to: www.cal.msu.edu)

The ideal candidate will work at the intersection of critical and creative studies and will bring enthusiastic willingness to work collaboratively with colleagues in the department and college. Within Writing, Rhetoric, and American Cultures (WRAC), the new colleague will contribute to the department’s vertical writing curriculum that includes first-year writing, an undergraduate major in professional writing, and a graduate program in rhetoric and writing. The major area of teaching responsibility will be courses in multimedia writing and video composing; other expectations include consulting on multimedia and visual composing in curricular and co-curricular contexts; maintaining an active agenda of research and/or multimedia production; seeking external funding for projects; and contributing to university outreach.

In its vertical writing curriculum, WRAC’s mission is to offer culturally and technologically relevant writing instruction, focused on processes of inquiry. WRAC is home to cutting-edge research on digital writing practices, professional and technical writing, community literacys, and cultural rhetorics. Further information about the department is available at wrac.msu.edu

Applicants expected to hold a PhD or other terminal degree in rhetoric, writing, or a related field or (in the case of specialists) have equivalent professional experience. We seek colleagues with a record of scholarship and teaching or equivalent professional experience in at least two of the following areas: film, video, or audio-visual production and analysis; audio-visual media production with/in community and cultural groups; outreach and engagement involving new media technologies; multimedia composing in project-based courses; social networking and content management work related to the digital humanities.

Applications should include a statement of interest describing qualifications and experience and a c.v. Review of applications will begin February 15, 2011, and continue until position is filled. For inquiries contact Prof. Ellen Cushman (cushmane@msu.edu or 517-432-2575) or Prof. Bump Halbritter (drbump@msu.edu or 517-432-2569).

About Michigan State University

Known internationally as a major U.S. public university with global reach, Michigan State University has been advancing knowledge and transforming lives through innovative teaching, research, and outreach for nearly 150 years. MSU is a member of the Association of American Universities, the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, and the Big Ten athletic conference. In 2012, Michigan State University will be home to the new Eli and Edythe Broad Art Museum, designed by world renowned architect Zaha Hadid, which will become a premier venue for modern and contemporary art.

MSU is committed to achieving excellence through cultural diversity. The university actively encourages applications and/or nominations of women, persons of color, veterans and persons with disabilities.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

ATTW 2011 Research Methods Workshops!

ATTW 2011 Research Methods Workshops
Atlanta April 5, 2011 8:30-12:00
Scholarships Available!

The Research Methods Workshops are an initiative of the Research Committee of the Association of Teachers of Technical Writing (ATTW) aimed at providing an opportunity for those entering the profession and those less trained in research to develop more sophisticated research skills.

This year, ATTW is sponsoring two Research Methods Workshops:

• Christina Haas, University of Minnesota, and Chad Wickham, Auburn University, on Building Conceptual Structures from Qualitative Data

• Jeff Grabill, Michigan State, on Research Practices in Action Research

These two half-day workshops will be held in Atlanta on Tuesday morning, April 5, 8:30-12:00. This is the day preceding the ATTW conference (April 6) and the CCCC conference (April 6-9).

Each workshop focuses on a methodology for data analysis and is designed to help researchers create and try out an analytic approach using their own data. Building Conceptual Structures from Qualitative Data with Christina Haas and Chad Wickham focuses on developing units of analysis for qualitative data and using those units to systematically and inductively build theory. Research Practices in Action Research with Jeff Grabill focuses on data collection and analysis in action research, an approach to research that seeks to effect change. Complete descriptions of these workshops can be found below.

Registration for each workshop is $100. Ten scholarships of $200 each are available to graduate students to defray the cost of the workshop and hotel.

Participation in these workshops is awarded on a competitive basis and constitutes a place on the ATTW program.

To apply for a place in one of these workshops, complete the attached registration form, and send it along with a 1-page description of your project to cgeisler@sfu.ca. Please make sure to indicate on the form whether you wish to be considered for a scholarship. Applications are due November 15, 2010 and acceptances will emailed to you by Dec 1.

ATTWWorkshopApplication

Questions about these workshops can be directed to either of the Co-Chairs of the ATTW Committee on Research, Cheryl Geisler (cgeisler@sfu.ca) or Bill Hart-Davidson (hartdav2@msu.edu).

****

Building Conceptual Structures from Qualitative Data
Christina Haas, University of Minnesota
Chad Wickman, Auburn University

Writing researchers are often confronted with a vexing question: How do we develop a theoretical account of writing — a larger vision, in Haraway’s words –while still remaining true to the particularities of “the somewhere,” the settings and situations we study? The purpose of this workshop is to help writing researchers develop strategies for understanding and addressing a two-pronged problem: delineating a units of analysis in qualiativequalitative research and using that those units to systematically and inductively build theory.

The purpose of this workshop is to explore analytic methods for inductively generating theory from data. Toward that end, we will focus, specifically, on ways in which researchers can justify the (inductive) movement between data, units of analysis, conceptual structures, and theories of broader scope that can inform ongoing data collection and analysis. Three questions will guide how we think about and engage with this process: 1) How do we articulate viable units of analysis that can be traced to specific data? 2) How do we articulate conceptual structures that can be traced to specific units of analysis? 3) How do we articulate substantive theory that can be traced to specific conceptual structures, units of analysis, and data? Exploring these questions is critical both for building theory from data and for articulating this process in a way that helps to warrant our broader theoretical claims.

The workshop will begin by considering ways to identify units of analysis in different kinds of data. Depending on participants’ needs, these might include:

• Multi-Semiotic Texts

• Recorded Talk

• Video (Gesture)

• Images

• Material Artifacts

Working with their own data and/or samples provided by workshop leaders, participants will articulate units of analysis and consider the various ways in which these units can be developed into conceptual structures and thus integrated into theory that can 1) be turned back toward the data being analyzed; and 2) be turned outward toward other, similar data sets.

Participants will ideally have research designs in mind, and perhaps research underway, that explores in situ writing activity and the ways in which texts function in various social and cultural contexts. Participants will also be asked to read two or three article-length foundational texts prior to the start of the workshop.

Research Practices in Action Research

Jeff Grabill, Michigan State University

Researchers in professional and technical communication are interested in how people use language to “do work” in the world. They share this interest with scholars in rhetoric (among others). But what counts as “the world,” and “work,” and the mechanisms of that activity (language, writing, performance) can vary quite a bit across and among these researchers. In addition, some researchers are also interested in approaches to research that seek, in their design, to effect some change. This workshop will focus on action research as a way of acting in the world as researchers.

This workshop will provide a brief overview of the various meanings of “action research,” “participatory [action] research,” and similar traditions like “critical” or “engaged” research. In this regard, participants will walk away from the workshop with a useful understanding of these traditions. As part of this overview, however, we will also consider what action research might and should look like as writing research.

The second part of the workshop will consist of participants in groups applying concepts to their own projects or, absent projects, scenarios that will be provided to them. In this second portion of the workshop, we will work through issues of methodology by focusing on research practices. We will focus in particular on details related to data collection and data analysis. The central problem of the workshop is to understand how to do research and action in the same project.

This workshop is aimed at participants involved in research projects that investigate writing and rhetoric and social contexts with an eye toward direct intervention. Prior to the workshop, participants will be asked to read foundational materials related to action research as well as a number of studies. They will also be asked to bring drafts of study designs or ideas to share.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WIDE Crew Travels to Fargo, Headlines Conference

Jeff Grabill, Stacey Pigg, and Bill Hart-Davidson are headed to the 2010 CPACW/CT3 Conference, “WIDE Open Spaces,” hosted at North Dakota State University–Fargo.  The conference, a hybrid conference and unconference, will focus on issues of virtual worlds, digital places, online instruction, and rhetorical spaces.

In addition to individual presentations, the WIDE team will jointly deliver the keynote address, “Mapping the Writing Lives of College Students: A Story about a Study in Three Parts,” which will discuss the history and trajectory of WIDE’s continuing research about the writing practices of college students.  From the conference program:

This talk focuses on the results of new multi-institutional study led by the WIDE research center at Michigan State University on the rich and complex writing lives of US college students. But this talk is also about how this study–with partners at a number of institutions in addition to a large team at MSU–was conceived and conducted. The talk, therefore, is at once a talk about research and about the creation of an institutional culture that fosters research. We will talk first about the work conducted prior to the current study, then about the findings of our current study, and finally with a discussion of the implications, questions raised, and next steps.

The presentation slides can be viewed below, or download here (PDF).

Follow on Twitter:

Update 10/8:

Stacey Pigg presenting “Stories from the Coffehouse”:

Follow Twitter hash #gpacw2010 as Bill, Jeff and Stacey live-tweet the conference!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New Research: Measuring Helpfulness in Online Peer Review

Our SIGDOC 2010 proceedings paper Measuring Helpfulness in Online Peer Review was published this week. And though none of the authors made it to Brazil for the conference, sadly, we are happy that the work is now available.

We are especially proud to announce that our undergraduate research assistant Chris Klerkx and R&W Master’s student Michael Wojcik are both authors on this paper along with WIDE UX Lead Mike McLeod and WIDE Co-Director Bill Hart-Davidson. Bravo Chris for building that C.V. early in your academic career! (he was a first-year student at MSU when we wrote the paper, and he has just begun his sophomore year).

Here is more about the method described in the paper:

Our review method takes input from a structured but flexible review workflow and stores the artifacts generated in the review process (e.g. comments, suggestions for revisions) along with other user-supplied descriptive and evaluative data that correspond with review metrics (such as whether or not a comment addressed a specific review criterion). The core method is designed as a web service that can receive this input from a variety of different sources and production environments, performing the analytics needed to calculate reviewer helpfulness and visualizations meant to offer both formative and summative feedback of reviewers’ performance. Our method understands a review to be a group activity consisting of reviewers, review targets (documents), and criteria, all under the direction of a review coordinator.
There are a number of specific applications for this method, but we will focus on one application called “Eli” that has been developed for online peer review in classroom settings. Eli gives feedback to both teachers and students about reviewers’ helpfulness in both a single review (a helpfulness score) and over time (a helpfulness index) so that students’ ability to do reviews can be meaningfully evaluated.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stacey Pigg & Jeff Grabill to Lead New IMLS-funded Project on Science Learning in Digital Musems

The Writing in Digital Environments Research Center is one of the Institute for Museum & Library Services 2010 National Leadership Grant award winners and will lead a three year project entitled “Facilitating Learning in Digital Museum Environments.”

The main focus of the project is to evaluate the effectiveness of “facilitation” – strategies used by museum staff and volunteers – in online exhibits. The project will seek to understand facilitation styles and their outcomes in two distinct but representative museum environments. The first, Science Buzz at Science Museum of Minnesota, is a popular Web site identified by the field to be exemplary because of its educational value and its use of Web 2.0 functionality. The second is the more distributed use of social software at the Museum of Life and Science in Durham, North Carolina. The first uses learning platforms that are hosted internally, while the second is experimenting with building learning communities where people are already gathering on the Web, such as Flickr, Twitter, and YouTube.

Researchers will closely follow activity at each museum, using discourse analysis as their primary analytical approach with the goal of identifying clear, replicable facilitation styles and indicators of learning associated with those styles.

Rhetoric & Writing Ph.D. Student and WIDE RA Stacey Pigg played a major role in a previous project funded by IMLS, and took a leading role in this follow-up proposal as well. Pigg, who is planning to defend her dissertation & graduate this year, is also on the academic job market. This award means that she will likely take her role on the new project with her to her new institution as she begins her career in a faculty role. Congrats Stacey!

The project will be led by Professor Jeff Grabill, WIDE Co-Director. Grabill’s work on the previous IMLS project as Co-PI and study coordinator will carry over into the new project as well. Colleagues in Museum Studies at both of the two partner sites will also play research roles on the project.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What Kinds of Writing do College Students Do & Value Most? OMG! TXT!

A new multi-institutional study led by the WIDE research center at Michigan State University finds that U.S. College Students have rich and complex writing lives. The survey of 1366 students finds that sending and receiving SMS messages – “texting” – is the most frequent and most valued type of writing for this group, with more respondents reporting using a cell phone on a regular basis than a pencil. Cell phones were also surprisingly versatile writing tools for students, accounting for genres as varied as shopping lists and interpersonal notes to drama and poetry.

A white paper describing the initial findings includes the following:

  • SMS texts (i.e., texts using short message services on mobile devices), emails, and lecture notes are three of the most frequently written genres (or types) of writing
  • SMS texts and academic writing are the most frequently valued genres
  • Some electronic genres written frequently by participants, such as writing in social networking environments, are not valued highly
  • Students’ write for personal fulfillment nearly as often as for school assignments
  • Institution type (2yr, 4yr; Doctoral vs. Masters granting, etc.) is related in a meaningful way to the writing experiences of participants, particularly what they write and the technologies used
  • Digital writing platforms—cell phones, Facebook, email—are frequently associated with writing done most often
  • Students mostly write alone, and writing alone is valued over writing collaboratively
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A New Look for the WIDE Site?

Yes, we have a new look and a new CMS for the WIDE World Web. Why, you ask? Both are in response to new MSU guidelines for Brand & Identity Standards.

We expect the look to evolve a little over the next few days and weeks as we settle into the new digs. As always, drop us a line if you have a comment or question!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WIDE to Keynote at Great Plains Computers and Writing

North Dakota State University is hosting a meeting in October that plays with “WIDE” as a name and theme and that features presentations from us. The meeting, themed “WIDE Open Spaces” focuses on digital environments in relationship with open sources, access, and possibilities and the spaces in which this activity takes place.

The conference aims to blend more traditional academic presentations on research and teaching with the more free-form collaboration of an unconference. Presenters and collaborators are encouraged to apply for either a presentation, a panel, or an unconference project. Friday’s program will consist of 15-20 minute presentations or 60 minute panels, keynote addresses, and vendor displays.

Saturday’s program will be an unconference format: open sessions for collaboration, project development, skill enhancement.

The WIDE (Writing in Digital Environments) Research Center Jeff Grabill, Stacey Pigg, and Bill Hart-Davidson) will give keynotes and workshops to discuss lessons learned and share best practices in creating innovative campus/community digital partnerships. We are thrilled to be able to participate in this meeting.

For more: http://www.socialmedia.ndsu.nodak.edu/?page_id=2

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Grabill’s Book "Writing Community Change" wins award

Jeff Grabill’s book Writing Community Change: Designing Technologies for Citizen Action has been awarded the Reflections“Outstanding Book Award for Civic Scholarship.” The book was chosenfrom a very competitive field of nominations by a prestigious panel ofscholars, including Ellen Cushman, Tom Deans, Paula Mathieu, and AdrianWurr. Grabill will be presented with the award at the SyracuseUniversity Department Party taking place at the CCCC annual Conventionon Thursday, March 18 at Tengo Sed Cantina in downtown Louisville, KY,4328 S. 4th Street, at approximately 8pm. As part of this award, Reflections will donate $100 to a community based organization of Grabill’s choice as well as provide a free full page ad for the book in Reflections. Grabill will also be interviewed for an upcoming feature in an issue of the journal.

Writing Community Change is available from Hampton Press.

The Reflections Civic Scholarship Outstanding Book Award is presentedannually
 to the author(s) or editor(s) of a book published in the pasttwo years whose
 work engages public and/or disciplinary
 conversationsabout civic engagement
 in issues of writing, rhetoric, and literacy ininnovative, compelling, and
 challenging ways. The goal of this awardis to recognize scholarship that
provides a research model that bridgesacademic and community systems and
 practices of knowledge production;exhibits a writing style designed to speak to audiences within andpotentially
 beyond the specific fields of rhetoric and composition;demonstrates a methodological framework that theorizes ways to createinclusive, ethical, and reciprocal relationships within communities;promotes public discussion about the nature of civic responsibilityboth
 inside and outside of the academy. The committee felt thatGrabill’s book offered an important intervention into how technologycan serve not only community engagement, but community political andeconomic development.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lee Griffin, WIDE researcher, presents at Assessment Institute.


A WIDE team has designed a unique online system for assessingMSU’s Tier I writing program. The system combines multiple means of datacollection and analysis with an online faculty community that will determinecriteria for student learning outcomes and apply them to assess learning. Thedesign fuses advances in technology with advances in learning theory andassessment practices.

One of the team members, Merilee Griffin, presented thetheoretical framework and some initial research on online assessment communitiesat the Assessment Institute, the nation’s largest and longest-runningconference on assessment, in late October. Many presentations and panels at theconference reflected a general trend toward assessments that engage faculty inassessing deep learning and utilize technology to facilitate the assessmentprocess.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment